![](\"https:\/\/www.celebitchy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/variety-marvel.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
This is Variety\u2019s cover story this week: \u201cIs Marvel In Trouble?\u201d The answer is yes, it is. But surely the better question would be: is the Marvel business model sustainable for much longer? The answer to that question is a resounding NO. There\u2019s a lot of information in Variety\u2019s cover story about where it all went wrong and how 2023 became the year where everything fell apart for Marvel. But there\u2019s also some shocking new info about Jonathan Majors, who plays Kang the Conqueror in several Marvel properties, from Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania<\/em> to the current season of Loki<\/em>. Majors\u2019 Kang was being set up as the \u201cbig bad\u201d of the next Avengers film, which is due to film next year. Following Majors\u2019 arrest in March, Marvel mostly sat on their hands and took a wait-and-see approach. That\u2019s blown up in their faces as each month brings a new horror story about Majors\u2019 violence and psychotic behavior. Some highlights from this Variety piece:<\/p>\n Jonathan Majors had been poised to carry the next phase of the MCU.<\/strong> The actor insists he is the victim, but the damage to his reputation and the chance he could lose the case has forced Marvel to reconsider its plans to center the next phase of its interlocking slate of sequels, spinoffs and series around Majors\u2019 villainous character, Kang the Conqueror. At the [Marvel summit] in Palm Springs [this spring], executives discussed backup plans, including pivoting to another comic book adversary, like Dr. Doom. But making any shift would carry its own headaches: Majors was already a big presence in the MCU, including as the scene-stealing antagonist in February\u2019s \u201cAnt-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania.\u201d And he has been positioned as the franchise\u2019s next big thing in this season of \u201cLoki\u201d \u2014 particularly in the finale, which airs on Nov. 9 and sets up Kang as the titular star of a fifth \u201cAvengers\u201d film in 2026. <\/p>\n Marvel is screwed:<\/strong> \u201cMarvel is truly f–ked with the whole Kang angle,\u201d says one top dealmaker who has seen the final \u201cLoki\u201d episode. \u201cAnd they haven\u2019t had an opportunity to rewrite until very recently [because of the WGA strike]. But I don\u2019t see a path to how they move forward with him.\u201d <\/p>\n Wall-to-wall Marvel programming on film & TV destroyed everything:<\/strong> But the ensuing tsunami of spandex proved to be too much of a good thing, and the demands of churning out so much programming taxed the Marvel apparatus. Moreover, the need to tease out an interwoven storyline over so many disparate shows, movies and platforms created a muddled narrative that baffled viewers. \u201cThe Marvel machine was pumping out a lot of content. Did it get to the point where there was just too much, and they were burning people out on superheroes? It\u2019s possible,\u201d says Wall Street analyst Eric Handler, who covers Disney. \u201cThe more you do, the tougher it is to maintain quality. They tried experimenting with breaking in some new characters, like Shang-Chi and Eternals, with mixed results. With budgets as big as these, you need home runs.\u201d <\/p>\n The Marvel VFX team:<\/strong> Marvel\u2019s entire VFX battalion, including staffers and vendors, is struggling to keep pace with a never-ending stream of productions. This past February, when the credits rolled at the world premiere of \u201cQuantumania,\u201d shock rippled through the Regency Village Theatre in Westwood over some shoddy CGI. \u201cThere were at least 10 scenes where the visual effects had been added at the last minute and were out of focus,\u201d says one veteran power broker who was there. \u201cIt was insane. I\u2019ve never seen something like that in my entire career. Everyone was talking about it. Even the kids of executives were talking about it.\u201d<\/p>\n The lack of preproduction script development is also a huge issue:<\/strong> Some internal sources\u2026 point to the \u201cShe-Hulk\u201d VFX issues as a symptom of a deeper rot \u2014 namely a lack of oversight on script development. In the original arc of \u201cShe-Hulk,\u201d a flashback of star Tatiana Maslany\u2019s transformation into her Hulk character didn\u2019t take place until Episode 8, the penultimate episode. But after Marvel\u2019s brain trust watched footage, it realized the scene needed to happen in the pilot episode so that audiences could see more of the character\u2019s backstory early. That meant that the VFX team was tasked with fixing the mess in postproduction. \u201cThe so-called bad VFX we see was because of half-baked scripts,\u201d says one person involved with \u201cShe-Hulk.\u201d \u201cThat is not Victoria. That is Kevin. And even above Kevin. Those issues should be addressed in preproduction. The timeline is not allowing the Marvel executives to sit with the material.\u201d<\/p>\n She-Hulk costs WHAT?<\/strong> All the while, Marvel was bleeding money, with a single episode of \u201cShe-Hulk\u201d costing some $25 million, dwarfing the budget of a final-season episode of HBO\u2019s \u201cGame of Thrones, \u201d but without a similar Zeitgeist bang. <\/p>\n The Jonathan Majors problem:<\/strong> When the \u201cQuantumania\u201d actor was arrested in March, Disney executives insisted that they could afford to play a wait-and-see game, given that \u201cAvengers: The Kang Dynasty\u201d wasn\u2019t expected to begin shooting until early 2024. But then Majors was dropped in quick succession by his publicists and managers. (He remains a client at WME \u2014 the agency where he landed after CAA parted ways with him, pre-arrest, for his \u201cbrutal conduct\u201d toward staff, says one source. CAA declined to comment.) A studio source notes that regardless of the actor\u2019s legal issues, Marvel already had considered moving away from a Majors-led phase because of the box office performance of \u201cQuantumania,\u201d which will struggle to make a profit. \u201cIt gave people pause given that \u2018Quantumania\u2019 didn\u2019t exactly land,\u201d the source says. <\/p>\n Recasting Kang?<\/strong> Recasting Majors is also an option, as Feige did when he replaced Terrence Howard in \u201cIron Man 2\u201d with Don Cheadle. In fact, Marvel isn\u2019t afraid to change direction, even after making splashy announcements. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n [From Variety]<\/p>\n Since I don\u2019t watch Loki, I\u2019m just going off what I read from Marvel fans and they wonder why a cinematic \u201cmultiverse\u201d can\u2019t figure out a way to simply recast the Kang role, especially given that the recast would so easily be explained as \u201cthis is just a multiverse Kang.\u201d Granted, I\u2019m sure there are contractual issues, but again, Majors brutalized his girlfriend (who was also a Marvel employee) while working on a Marvel project. This isn\u2019t even a moral stand for Marvel – keeping Majors on in any way is a huge legal and financial liability in like twenty different ways.<\/p>\n As for the other stuff\u2026 it\u2019s absolutely f–king mindblowing to me that Marvel\u2019s answer to everything is \u201cthrowing tens of millions of dollars at something to fix it in postproduction.\u201d Take a third of that money and invest in quality preproduction, make sure you have all of the scripts locked down and get everything storyboarded. The overreliance on VFX instead of writers and hands-on producers is what has brought down Marvel more than anything else (it\u2019s the same f–king story with LucasFilm, but that\u2019s a comparison for another day).<\/p>\n Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Disney+. Cover courtesy of Variety.<\/small><\/p>\n\n
![](\"https:\/\/www.celebitchy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/avalon-0756771544.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/www.celebitchy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/loki2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n